Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Subdivisions’ Category

Q:  Is it okay to use the same LCSH, but with different subdivisions?  Would this be too repetitive? A:  No, that is fine.  If you are trying to bring out certain aspects of the subject, you have to repeat main LCSH.  For example, it is better to repeat the LCSH than to add on the [...]

Read Full Post »

Q:  If we use a |v field in the LCSH that we come up with, should it be added to all the subject headings in our record? A:  Yes, it should be applied because it will be true of all LCSH.  However, you have to read the scope note for the use of that Form [...]

Read Full Post »

Q.  If there is a specific subject heading that covers more than one topic, would I choose that versus a more general heading and a subdivision? A.  You have to brainstorm about what you think the book is about and then go into the AF to see what you find in terms of a main [...]

Read Full Post »

Q.  We should be searching under the subdivision heading in the authority file for subdivisions, right? A.  Yes.  You can only do a separate search on subdivision in Connexion.  For example, if you want to use rhetoric as a subdivision, you can search as a subdivision. If you want to use it as the main [...]

Read Full Post »

Q.  What do I do with something that is a collection of essays… and I cannot for the life of me find anything like this in the LCSH? A. Yes, on the right track, simplify- think Essays.

Read Full Post »

Q. I’m confused, so form can be journal/textbook/manual or drama/mystery/documentary – or do you mean that the drama/etc. would be the subdivision of genre and the journal/etc. is the main form heading? A. A form a book takes can be any number of things.  You can bring out the form with the use of an [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Would it work to have two topical subdivisions, even if they are separated by another subdivision (like say a chronological one)? A. Generally two topical subdivisions do not work unless they are established as such or the scope note allows it with the main LCSH. Read the scope notes closely.  If you want to [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Would it be okay if you placed a subdivision on a genre heading? A. Yes, you can do that. Again, do the authority work on the subd.

Read Full Post »

Q. So it wouldn’t work to have two topical subdivisions, even if they are separated by another subdivision (like say a chronological one)? A. Generally two topical do not work unless they are established as such or the scope note allows it with the main LCSH. Read the scope notes closely. If you want to [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Can I just use synonyms for LCSH? A. You should think about the subject in different terms. Try to bring out a secondary topic. Review the subdivisions for something else. If you want to use as a subdivision and it does not work with the main LCSH then consider it as the main LCSH. [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Is there a limit to how many subdivisions we can have in one heading? A. There is a limit in terms of making sure they work with the main LCSH. Generally, you will have a main LCSH and one topical, one geog. and one form if necessary. You can have a main LCSH and [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Is it okay to stick with an LCSH even if it can’t be divided geographically? A. Yes, it is perfectly fine. Not all LCSH can be subdivided geographically and if it is a good subject heading for the item then you would probably use it and try to bring out the place concept with [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. In general, a subdivision (if not already established) is created in the same way a subject heading is, right? Just searching for terms that describe the work. And can we add subdivisions to any subject heading as long as the scope notes say it’s okay? A. Right.

Read Full Post »

Q. About scope notes: In general I’m not seeing scope notes in my searches, am I doing something wrong or is it that there aren’t scope notes for it? A. Notes are in the 6XX tags in the AF records. They are the 680 tags found in subdivision records.

Read Full Post »

Q. With form subdivision, do we only use this subdivision if the ENTIRE work is this form, not if it just contains it, like maps. A. Right, the entire work is in the form, i.e., a dictionary or a journal. Then every LCSH will have that form subd. provided you read the scope note and [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. I know that 2 Subject Headings are required, but is there a requirement for subdivisions? A. You are required to make the subject heading as specific as possible, that may entail adding subdivisions. In some cases, yes, they are necessary and required.

Read Full Post »

Q. Just in general, is there ever a time when you could have a subdivision with a 600 tag? A. 600 tags are tricky. The subd. scope note must state that it can be used with personal names. Or you have to find one established such as the est. subd. found on the pattern headings [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. For Cole: is an editor tag still optional here? A. The designation of function is an optional rule. Up to you, but if you add it you must use the correct punctuation and subfield, etc.

Read Full Post »

Q. For Taylor’s title, Cataloging and Classification, below is the LCSH that I have for the book. Is this correct?  I did an authority search for cataloging and classification and this is what showed up? 650 _0  Classification |x Books A. Yes, this would work. You found it in the 150 tag so you know [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. In the example on the Variable Fields Summary document the 830 is transcribed like this: 830_0 Bulletin (Indiana Library Federation) ; |v no. 3. Does the 830 tag have final punctuation? A. 830′s must have final punctuation. It is required of this tag.   And, you still need to add the numeration.

Read Full Post »

Q. For the Hesse title, I know the| v should be poetry, right? How do I look this up? There are 4000 search results. I can’t figure out what should be the topical term. I also saw you could do a keyword search but I don’t see where you can do that? Am I doing [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. This is all I have for the LCSH for the Hesse title, is this correct? 650 _0 |y Dust Bowl Era, 1931-1939 A. You are on the right track with this one. The story did take place during the Dust Bowl era. You have to search the AF to find the established heading for [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. For the Badminton book, in the 650 I used: Badminton (Game). This just doesn’t seem right to me.  Is this all I need? A. Yes, this is the LCSH.  This is a simple search in the AF for badminton as an LCSH and this is the established heading. Don’t forget your indicators for the [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Can I add the following additional LCSH for the Lavine title? Farm life |z Oklahoma |y Dust Bowl Era, 1931-1939 |v Juvenile fiction. A. Searching the AF for Oklahoma as a geographic name I found the following: Oklahoma. E1. [151] 1 record E2. [551] 1 record E3. ǂx Antiquities [151] 1 record E4. ǂx Antiquities [551] 16 records [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Does the following LCSH work for the Kent title? 650    _0    Ranch life |z Nevada |v Fiction. A. This only works if “Ranch life” can be subdivided geographically.  And in the AF, we find that it can.  The lower case “i” in the Fixed Fields indicates this for us.   See Geo subdivision: i in [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Do you have to have multiple 650′s or is one okay?  For example for the Lavine title I have: 650    _0    Horses |x Indians |v Juvenile fiction. A. When you search horses, you do not find Indians as an established subdivision.  SO, now you must search Indians as a subdivision.  It is found in [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Does an LCSH have to exactly match what you have in the answer keys? A. NO!  You may come up with something completely different.  It must be in line with the subjects of the book and the established LCSH per the AF.  You may think about a subject in a different way and with [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. Can you help with LCSH? A. LCSH are actually pretty simple. You think of a term or a phrase that a book is about.  You go into the AF with that term or phrase and search it as an LCSH.  If you find it, you use the established heading from the AF as your [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. If I use a LCSH with an established geographic subheading in my record, do I still have to geographically subdivide all the other LCSH’s I use that allow for geographic subdivision? A. If the place aspect refers to all of the subjects of the book, which it usually does, then yes, You must try [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. You give the example of “|x History |y 20th century” in the notes. But, what if I wanted to use this to modify a LCSH, and ALSO wanted to include a geographic subheading? Where would the |z go? Normally it would be between the |x and |y, but “|x History |y 20th century” is [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. How do you know when you are using a subdivision to modify another subdivision in that “string” or the original (broadest) term? A. You can add subdivisions only if they are in agreement with the main LCSH and you can’t break up existing established subdivisions from the AF. Be careful with the geographic subdivision, [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. We have AACR2, OCLC’s MARC tags resource, and the LC Rule interpretations to help with what we have learned so far… But I’m still not sure what source to use when I have more in depth questions about LCSH. Where should I be looking for these? A. There are several books on the Suggested [...]

Read Full Post »

Q. There is an explanation of the form subdivision usage that says: “If a form subdivision such as “Dictionary” is used, it must be attached to all headings in the record“. I don’t quite understand it. Does this mean that if I have two 650 fields in a record and intend to use “fiction” as [...]

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.